Form 8886 & 419 Litigation Plans 412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Monday, January 21, 2013
IRS to Audit Sea Nine VEBA Participating Employers
December 20, 2012 By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
IRS audit of Sea Nine participating employers By Lance Wallach
IRS audit of Sea Nine participating employers In recent months, I have received phone calls from participants in the Sea Nine VEBA and have learned that the IRS may be auditing many more participating employers in the coming months. To better assist current Sea Nine clients and those that are now or may be under audit in the future, my associates who are CPAs, tax attys and former IRS employees will continue to help with the Sea Nine VEBA victims and others in 419 412i captive insurance and section 79 scams and answer the following:
• What is the IRS’s position with respect to the Sea Nine VEBA,
Search 11 new network update. My Network Jobs Messaging Notifications Lance Wallach Me Work icon Work Learning Messaging Compose message Tap for popup settings IRS audits sea nine veba, ken elliot and ramesh sarva sued. Published on Published onFebruary 11, 2016 Edit article View stats Lance Wallach Lance Wallach 199 Unlike 2 Comment 18
32 Edit article CPA Ramesh Sarva and Kenneth Elliot led Tax Fairy seekers to Section 419, which provides for VEBAs — “Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association” plans. Properly operated, VEBAs enable employers to make deductible contributions to a plan that buys insurance for employees.
A company associated with Mr. Sarva and Mr. Elliot, Sea Nine, told employers that they could use VEBAs to get around the tax law rules against deducting most life insurance premiums. Their customers deducted contributions to VEBAs and used them to buy whole-life insurance policies with high cash value accumulation on the business owners’ lives. The owners then borrowed the cash values. The purported result was a deduction, followed by tax-free access to the deducted cash via borrowing cash values.
Tax Fairy guides can always find willing customers: “…small business owners with high net worth (often doctors with small but lucrative medical practices),” according to the IRScomplaint. It has not gone well for the Tax Fairy adherents:
Sarva has successfully marketed at least 33 separate VEBAs plans to a variety of small business owners. All of these participants have been or are currently being audited by the IRS. 13 of these participant audits have been completed and have resulted in total tax adjustments of $3,500,519.
In other words, it doesn’t work. The IRS warned people off of such plans as early as 1995, and the scheme was firmly shot down by a U.S. Court of Appeals in 2002 in the Neonatology Assoc. P.A. case. In fact, Neonatology was a Sea Nine client. Undaunted, Sea Nine kept selling the idea, selling the plans through “a network of affiliated third parties” including “independent certified publica accountants (“CPA”) and financial planners.” At least they did until yesterday, when they consented to a permanent injunction yesterday against further Tax Fairy hunts.
Sea Nine had clients all over the place; the complaint lists clients in California, Florida, Alabama, and Hawaii, all with big IRS exam adjustments
Form 8886 & 419 Litigation Plans
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Monday, January 21, 2013
IRS to Audit Sea Nine VEBA Participating Employers
December 20, 2012 By Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC
IRS audit of Sea Nine participating employers
By Lance Wallach
IRS audit of Sea Nine participating employers
In recent months, I have received phone calls from participants in the Sea Nine VEBA and have learned that the IRS may be auditing many more participating employers in the coming months. To better assist current Sea Nine clients and those that are now or may be under audit in the future, my associates who are CPAs, tax attys and former IRS employees will continue to help with the Sea Nine VEBA victims and others in 419 412i captive insurance and section 79 scams and answer the following:
• What is the IRS’s position with respect to the Sea Nine VEBA,
Search
ReplyDelete11 new network update.
My Network
Jobs
Messaging
Notifications
Lance Wallach
Me
Work icon
Work
Learning
Messaging
Compose message Tap for popup settings
IRS audits sea nine veba, ken elliot and ramesh sarva sued.
Published on Published onFebruary 11, 2016
Edit article
View stats
Lance Wallach
Lance Wallach
199
Unlike 2
Comment
18
32
Edit article
CPA Ramesh Sarva and Kenneth Elliot led Tax Fairy seekers to Section 419, which provides for VEBAs — “Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association” plans. Properly operated, VEBAs enable employers to make deductible contributions to a plan that buys insurance for employees.
A company associated with Mr. Sarva and Mr. Elliot, Sea Nine, told employers that they could use VEBAs to get around the tax law rules against deducting most life insurance premiums. Their customers deducted contributions to VEBAs and used them to buy whole-life insurance policies with high cash value accumulation on the business owners’ lives. The owners then borrowed the cash values. The purported result was a deduction, followed by tax-free access to the deducted cash via borrowing cash values.
Tax Fairy guides can always find willing customers: “…small business owners with high net worth (often doctors with small but lucrative medical practices),” according to the IRScomplaint. It has not gone well for the Tax Fairy adherents:
Sarva has successfully marketed at least 33 separate VEBAs plans to a variety of small business owners. All of these participants have been or are currently being audited by the IRS. 13 of these participant audits have been completed and have resulted in total tax adjustments of $3,500,519.
In other words, it doesn’t work. The IRS warned people off of such plans as early as 1995, and the scheme was firmly shot down by a U.S. Court of Appeals in 2002 in the Neonatology Assoc. P.A. case. In fact, Neonatology was a Sea Nine client. Undaunted, Sea Nine kept selling the idea, selling the plans through “a network of affiliated third parties” including “independent certified publica accountants (“CPA”) and financial planners.” At least they did until yesterday, when they consented to a permanent injunction yesterday against further Tax Fairy hunts.
Sea Nine had clients all over the place; the complaint lists clients in California, Florida, Alabama, and Hawaii, all with big IRS exam adjustments