26 U.S. Code § 412 - Minimum funding standards
(a) Requirement to meet minimum funding standard
(1) In general
A plan to which this section applies shall satisfy the minimum funding standard applicable to the plan for any plan year.
(2) Minimum funding standard
For purposes of paragraph (1), a plan shall be treated as satisfying the minimum funding standard for a plan year if—
(A) in the case of a defined benefit plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the employer makes contributions to or under the plan for the plan year which, in the aggregate, are not less than the minimum required contribution determined under section 430 for the plan for the plan year,
(b) Liability for contributions
(2) Joint and several liability where employer member of controlled group
If the employer referred to in paragraph (1) is a member of a controlled group, each member of such group shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of such contributions.
(3) Multiemployer plans in critical status
Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a multiemployer plan for any plan year in which the plan is in critical status pursuant to section 432. This paragraph shall only apply if the plan sponsor adopts a rehabilitation plan in accordance with section 432(e) and complies with such rehabilitation plan (and any modifications of the plan).
(c) Variance from minimum funding standards
(1) Waiver in case of business hardship
(A) In general
If—
(i) an employer is (or in the case of a multiemployer plan, 10 percent or more of the number of employers contributing to or under the plan are) unable to satisfy the minimum funding standard for a plan year without temporary substantial business hardship (substantial business hardship in the case of a multiemployer plan), and
(ii) application of the standard would be adverse to the interests of plan participants in the aggregate,
the Secretary may, subject to subparagraph (C), waive the requirements of subsection (a) for such year with respect to all or any portion of the minimum funding standard. The Secretary shall not waive the minimum funding standard with respect to a plan for more than 3 of any 15 (5 of any 15 in the case of a multiemployer plan) consecutive plan years [1]
(B) Effects of waiver
If a waiver is granted under subparagraph (A) for any plan year—
(2) Determination of business hardship
For purposes of this subsection, the factors taken into account in determining temporary substantial business hardship (substantial business hardship in the case of a multiemployer plan) shall include (but shall not be limited to) whether or not—
(3) Waived funding deficiency
For purposes of this section and part III of this subchapter, the term “waived funding deficiency” means the portion of the minimum funding standard under subsection (a) (determined without regard to the waiver) for a plan year waived by the Secretary and not satisfied by employer contributions.
(4) Security for waivers for single-employer plans, consultations
(A) Security may be required
(i) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the Secretary may require an employer maintaining a defined benefit plan which is a single-employer plan (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(15) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) to provide security to such plan as a condition for granting or modifying a waiver under paragraph (1).
(ii) Special rules Any security provided under clause (i) may be perfected and enforced only by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or at the direction of the Corporation, by a contributing sponsor (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(13) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), or a member of such sponsor’s controlled group (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(14) of such Act).
Articles
ReplyDeleteTaxAudit419.com Lawyer4audits.com VebaPlan.org Taxlibrary.us
LanceWallachchfc.blogspot.com
The Lance Wallach Network
Follow me on facebook & twitter
Copyright (C) 2010 - Lance Wallach
The IRS is cracking down on what it considers to be abusive tax shelters. Many of them are being
marketed to small business owners by insurance professionals, financial planners and even accountants
and attorneys. I speak at numerous conventions, for both business owners and accountants. And after I
speak, I am always approached by many people who have questions about tax reduction plans that they
have heard about. Below are the most common.
419 tax reduction insurance plans
These come in various versions, and most of them have or will get the participant audited and the
salesman sued. They purportedly allow the business owner to make a large tax-deductible contribution,
and some or all of the contribution pays for a life insurance product. The IRS has been disallowing most
versions of these plans for years, yet they continue to be sold. After everyone gets into trouble and the
insurance agents get sued, the promoters of the abusive versions sometimes change the name of their
company and call the plan something else. The insurance companies whose policies are sold are
legitimate companies. What usually is not legitimate is the way that most of the plans are operated. There
can also be a $200,000 IRS fine facing the insurance agent who sold the plan if Form 8918 has not been
properly filed. I've reviewed hundreds of these forms for agents and have yet to see one that was filled out
correctly.
When the IRS audits a participant in one of these plans, the tax deductions are lost. There is also the
interest and large penalties to consider. The business owner can also be facing a $200,000-a-year fine if he
did not properly file Form 8886. Most of these forms have been filled out improperly. In my talks with the
IRS, I was told that the IRS considers not filling out Form 8886 properly almost the same as not filing at all.
412(i) retirement plans
The IRS has been auditing participants in these types of retirement plans. While there is generally nothing
wrong with many of the newer plans, the IRS considered most of the older abusive plans. Forms 8918 and
8886 are also required for abusive 412(i) plans.
I have been an expert witness in a lot of these 419 and 412(i) lawsuits and I have not lost