Section 79 Plans: WHAT IS A SECTION 79 PLAN?

Section 79 Plans: WHAT IS A SECTION 79 PLAN?: Section 79 plans are commonly known for the $50,000 free term life insurance they can provide for employees. Less commonly known is tha...





26 U.S. Code § 412 - Minimum funding standards

Current through Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
PREV | NEXT

(a) Requirement to meet minimum funding standard
(1) In general
A plan to which this section applies shall satisfy the minimum funding standard applicable to the plan for any plan year.
(2) Minimum funding standard
For purposes of paragraph (1), a plan shall be treated as satisfying the minimum funding standard for a plan year if—
(A) in the case of a defined benefit plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the employer makes contributions to or under the plan for the plan year which, in the aggregate, are not less than the minimum required contribution determined under section 430 for the plan for the plan year,
(B) in the case of a money purchase plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the employer makes contributions to or under the plan for the plan year which are required under the terms of the plan, and
(C) in the case of a multiemployer plan, the employers make contributions to or under the plan for any plan year which, in the aggregate, are sufficient to ensure that the plan does not have an accumulated funding deficiency under section 431 as of the end of the plan year.
(b) Liability for contributions
(1) In general
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amount of any contribution required by this section (including any required installments under paragraphs (3) and (4) of section430 (j)) shall be paid by the employer responsible for making contributions to or under the plan.
(2) Joint and several liability where employer member of controlled group
If the employer referred to in paragraph (1) is a member of a controlled group, each member of such group shall be jointly and severally liable for payment of such contributions.
(3) Multiemployer plans in critical status
Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a multiemployer plan for any plan year in which the plan is in critical status pursuant to section 432. This paragraph shall only apply if the plan sponsor adopts a rehabilitation plan in accordance with section 432(e) and complies with such rehabilitation plan (and any modifications of the plan).
(c) Variance from minimum funding standards
(1) Waiver in case of business hardship
(A) In general
If—
(i) an employer is (or in the case of a multiemployer plan, 10 percent or more of the number of employers contributing to or under the plan are) unable to satisfy the minimum funding standard for a plan year without temporary substantial business hardship (substantial business hardship in the case of a multiemployer plan), and
(ii) application of the standard would be adverse to the interests of plan participants in the aggregate,
the Secretary may, subject to subparagraph (C), waive the requirements of subsection (a) for such year with respect to all or any portion of the minimum funding standard. The Secretary shall not waive the minimum funding standard with respect to a plan for more than 3 of any 15 (5 of any 15 in the case of a multiemployer plan) consecutive plan years  [1]
(B) Effects of waiver
If a waiver is granted under subparagraph (A) for any plan year—
(i) in the case of a defined benefit plan which is not a multiemployer plan, the minimum required contribution under section 430 for the plan year shall be reduced by the amount of the waived funding deficiency and such amount shall be amortized as required under section 430 (e), and
(ii) in the case of a multiemployer plan, the funding standard account shall be credited under section 431 (b)(3)(C) with the amount of the waived funding deficiency and such amount shall be amortized as required under section 431 (b)(2)(C).
(C) Waiver of amortized portion not allowed
The Secretary may not waive under subparagraph (A) any portion of the minimum funding standard under subsection (a) for a plan year which is attributable to any waived funding deficiency for any preceding plan year.
(2) Determination of business hardship
For purposes of this subsection, the factors taken into account in determining temporary substantial business hardship (substantial business hardship in the case of a multiemployer plan) shall include (but shall not be limited to) whether or not—
(A) the employer is operating at an economic loss,
(B) there is substantial unemployment or underemployment in the trade or business and in the industry concerned,
(C) the sales and profits of the industry concerned are depressed or declining, and
(D) it is reasonable to expect that the plan will be continued only if the waiver is granted.
(3) Waived funding deficiency
For purposes of this section and part III of this subchapter, the term “waived funding deficiency” means the portion of the minimum funding standard under subsection (a) (determined without regard to the waiver) for a plan year waived by the Secretary and not satisfied by employer contributions.
(4) Security for waivers for single-employer plans, consultations
(A) Security may be required
(i) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the Secretary may require an employer maintaining a defined benefit plan which is a single-employer plan (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(15) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) to provide security to such plan as a condition for granting or modifying a waiver under paragraph (1).
(ii) Special rules Any security provided under clause (i) may be perfected and enforced only by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or at the direction of the Corporation, by a contributing sponsor (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(13) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974), or a member of such sponsor’s controlled group (within the meaning of section 4001(a)(14) of such Act).
(B) Consultation with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the Secretary shall, before granting or modifying a waiver under this subsection with respect to a plan described in subparagraph (A)(i)—

1 comment:

  1. Articles


    TaxAudit419.com Lawyer4audits.com VebaPlan.org Taxlibrary.us

    LanceWallachchfc.blogspot.com

    The Lance Wallach Network

    Follow me on facebook & twitter

    Copyright (C) 2010 - Lance Wallach







    The IRS is cracking down on what it considers to be abusive tax shelters. Many of them are being
    marketed to small business owners by insurance professionals, financial planners and even accountants
    and attorneys. I speak at numerous conventions, for both business owners and accountants. And after I
    speak, I am always approached by many people who have questions about tax reduction plans that they
    have heard about. Below are the most common.

    419 tax reduction insurance plans

    These come in various versions, and most of them have or will get the participant audited and the
    salesman sued. They purportedly allow the business owner to make a large tax-deductible contribution,
    and some or all of the contribution pays for a life insurance product. The IRS has been disallowing most
    versions of these plans for years, yet they continue to be sold. After everyone gets into trouble and the
    insurance agents get sued, the promoters of the abusive versions sometimes change the name of their
    company and call the plan something else. The insurance companies whose policies are sold are
    legitimate companies. What usually is not legitimate is the way that most of the plans are operated. There
    can also be a $200,000 IRS fine facing the insurance agent who sold the plan if Form 8918 has not been
    properly filed. I've reviewed hundreds of these forms for agents and have yet to see one that was filled out
    correctly.

    When the IRS audits a participant in one of these plans, the tax deductions are lost. There is also the
    interest and large penalties to consider. The business owner can also be facing a $200,000-a-year fine if he
    did not properly file Form 8886. Most of these forms have been filled out improperly. In my talks with the
    IRS, I was told that the IRS considers not filling out Form 8886 properly almost the same as not filing at all.

    412(i) retirement plans

    The IRS has been auditing participants in these types of retirement plans. While there is generally nothing
    wrong with many of the newer plans, the IRS considered most of the older abusive plans. Forms 8918 and
    8886 are also required for abusive 412(i) plans.

    I have been an expert witness in a lot of these 419 and 412(i) lawsuits and I have not lost

    ReplyDelete